Skip to content
fastbrowsefastbrowse

compare

Compare fastbrowse with other browser agents.

fastbrowse is MIT licensed: the agent, CLI, MCP server and runtime are all in the repository. This page lists each alternative's licence, whether you can run it yourself, and the one head-to-head we measured.

back to fastbrowse.ai·all benchmarks

At a glance

Five things that decide whether you can run the agent where your work already is.

YesPartlyNo

Every cell was read on 2026-11-01 from that project's own repository, licence file or documentation. A no on the licence row means the browser-driving code is not published. Prices for fastbrowse hosted are on the pricing page.

Open source, and what that buys you

Run it yourself

The MIT licence covers the agent and the runtime. Point it at local Chrome, a browser you already have open, your own pool or fastbrowse hosted.

Read the loop

Control indexing, action choice, the authorization gate and the quote check are all in the repository. When a task fails you can see which step failed.

Change it and ship it

MIT carries no network-copyleft and no service clause. Embed it in a closed product, fork it, or wire in your own model, tools and graders without asking us or releasing your code.

No lock-in on the browser

The same agent runs on local Chrome, a Chrome you already have open, or a hosted browser. Switching between them is a configuration change.

What each licence obliges you to do

MIT
Permissive. Keep the notice, ship it inside a closed product, and change what you like.
Apache-2.0
Permissive, with an explicit patent grant and a patent-retaliation clause.
AGPL-3.0
Copyleft over a network. Run a modified version as a service and its source has to be offered.
SSPL-1.0
Not an OSI-approved open source licence. Offering it as a service carries a source-release obligation.

The field, by licence and hosting

Checked on 2026-11-01 against each project's own repository or licence file. A project whose browser-driving core is a hosted service is marked closed, even if its SDK is open source. For a vendor's own performance numbers, follow its link.

Browser agents and browser infrastructure, with licence and self-hosting for each, checked on 2026-11-01
ProjectWhat it isLicenceRun it yourself
fastbrowseOur agentAn agent that picks from the page's controls, cites what it read, and runs locally, in your own browser or in fastbrowse hosted.MITYes, the open source code
Browser UseA Python agent library, with Browser Use Cloud selling managed browsers and a hosted agent on top of it.MITThe library, not the cloud
Browser Use UltrafastA hosted Browser Use agent mode tuned for short tasks, run on their cloud only.closedNo, hosted only
Browser HarnessA small Browser Use project that points a coding agent at the Chrome you are already signed into.MITYes, the open source code
BrowserbaseManaged cloud browsers and a hosted agent platform; the SDK and MCP server around it are open source.closedNo, hosted only
StagehandBrowserbase's SDK that mixes Playwright code with act, extract and observe calls, on a local browser or theirs.MITThe library, not the cloud
SteelA browser API you run in Docker or buy hosted; the browser service itself is the open source part.Apache-2.0Yes, the open source code
BrowserlessThe long-running Docker headless Chrome service, sold as a cloud and as a self-hosted container.SSPL-1.0 or commercialYes, the open source code
HyperbrowserHosted browsers with agent and scraping APIs on top, sold per browser hour and per step.closedNo, hosted only
Anchor BrowserHosted browsers built around authenticated sessions, with on-premises deployment sold at the top tier.closedOn contract
KernelA managed browser runtime sold as a platform, with fast session starts and browser pools as the pitch.closedNo, hosted only
SkyvernA browser workflow agent that drives pages from screenshots, self-hostable, with a managed cloud as well.AGPL-3.0Yes, the open source code
NotteBrowser and automation infrastructure for agents, sold as a cloud, with an open source SDK that also runs browser sessions locally.SSPL-1.0The library, not the cloud
Playwright MCPMicrosoft's MCP server that gives a coding agent Playwright's own controls in a browser it drives.Apache-2.0Yes, the open source code
agent-browserVercel Labs' command line browser driver for coding agents, with no cloud account in the loop.Apache-2.0Yes, the open source code
LightpandaA headless browser written from scratch for automation, rather than a wrapper around Chromium.AGPL-3.0Yes, the open source code

"Not declared on the repository" means the repository metadata names no licence; it is not a statement about the vendor's terms.

The measured head-to-head

46 tasks, 3 repeats each, both agents run by us on the same task list with the hosted Browser Use agent at its defaults. The method, limits and per-task rows are on the benchmarks page.

Task success, execution time and cost per run for fastbrowse and the hosted Browser Use agent on the same tasks
AgentTask successExecution timeCost per run
fastbrowse99.2%18.9s$0.0296
Browser Use agent96.3%15.3s$0.3180

Task success is the share of scored runs the grader passed. Execution time is the median run, dispatch to answer, cold start included for both. Cost per run is the mean recorded charge. Read the method and limits before comparing these figures with any other suite.

Where each one fits

More on how fastbrowse acts: why an AI agent clicks the wrong button and an MCP browser server with spending limits.

Sources